Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Royal Commonwealth Society Commonwealth- Conversation: Latest News!

from Luvei Viti: Children of Fiji by Luvei Viti (Children of Fiji)
“The Commonwealth Conversation began in July 2009. Over the course of the past six months, we have heard much which gives us reason for concern, but more which gives us reason to hope. Above all, we have heard criticism and ideas which we believe can be used to construct a stronger Commonwealth for the future. Now, we are pulling together our final recommendations and a report which we will publish in early March. “

The Commonwealth Conversation Team

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Get Get Involved…
Who should be in the Eminent Persons Group? 

Following the publication of our Emerging Findings, Commonwealth member states mandated the Secretariat to put together an Eminent Persons Group to explore options for Commonwealth reform. But who should be in it?

BBC World Debate, ‘The Commonwealth at 60: does it have a future?’ In November 2009, we facilitated a BBC World Debate on the future of the Commonwealth.

Is homophobia on the rise in Africa? From Uganda to Malawi, homosexuality has been the subject of much recent debate across the Commonwealth’s African member states. What do you think? Is homophobia a growing problem in Africa?

‘Alas, still on a shoestring’ Is one of the Commonwealth’s biggest problems that it is chronically underfunded? Are countries expecting too much from an organistion to which they give too little?

Islam, tolerance and the Commonwealth: Dr Bari, Secretary-General of the Muslim Council of Britain talks to the Commonwealth Conversation team. …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
And finally…
If you have any more thoughts to share with us on the future of the Commonwealth, or on our Emerging Findings report, ‘Common What?’,http://www.thecommonwealthconversation.org/2009/11/commonwealth-conversation-emerging-findings-published/

now is the time to do so. Our Final Recommendations will be published in early March and we don’t want to miss anything important! Post a comment on our website, or send us an email.
http://www.thecommonwealthconversation.org/
……………………………………………………………………………………………

Fiji’s illegal regimes new Criminal Procedure Decree that comes into effect on Monday 1st February 2010, are the final acts of a predatory state seeking Legitimacy- the life giving oxygen for its survival. Some four years later, this is it, the big, “Final Solution.”

For Baimimarama’s Predatory State, this is the last weapon it has to use to survive. The theory goes that the fear of life incarceration will finally bludgeon those critics of his regime and the people into submission.

It is cruel coercion plain and simple. Bainimarama’s military training with the Chileans has exposed him well to such draconian measures. That country was famous for silencing all and sundry critics.

 This decree is chiefly concerned with protecting the Bainimarama regime and nothing more. Like Chilean dictator Pinochet who ruled for nearly two decades from 1973 this decree is used to ferret out and persecute political dissidents. Over 3,000 citizen of Chile were killed or are still missing as a result of such decrees.

 Again there have been calls from some international coup apologists this week for Australia and New Zealand to relax Travel Bans in support of re-engagement. Even though Australia and New Zealand have been magnanimous enough to not slap trade bans on and not cut aid.

They argue you will get a better caliber of civil servants and those serving on statutory boards etc.

This is simply not true .What right minded person would want to sacrifice his/ her professional integrity for an uncertain future? Job security is non existent with a dictatorial regime, provided you are a lackey.

See what happened to the recently fired magistrates and DPP lawyers – arbitrary firing, no due process and avenue to redress.

 Former Foreign affairs CEO Ratu Isoa Gavidi got the boot all for what? Giving the man sound diplomatic advice to enter into dialogue.

More so hoping meritocracy gets you to the top with the regime is a piped dream. Forget it.

Bainimarama posts his own people to tell him what he wants to hear. Look at the wholesale sacking of nine government ministers back in 2007.

 Basically what Bainimarama is saying is ‘Don’t confuse me with facts my minds made up!’

The latest grandstanding with New Zealand regarding Leweni’s posting is a sham.

Why conduct a public campaign by releasing Leweni’s name in the open press if the Nadi meeting was all in good faith? Obviously to pressure New Zealand in bad faith. As Driti openly admits, ‘they are testing the Kiwis’! I mean they tried the same thing with Malaysia as regards Driti’s posting. They politely and quietly refused without much fan fare and a firm, ‘Terima kasih menyimpan dia’ (thankyou- keep him- or even better – promote him!)

Bainimarama has a set mindset- in other words it is not in his DNA to Dialogue! New Zealand likes to be seen to understand the Pacific and it does in many ways. She did great with the Bougainville truce and peace accord.

 But with Prime Minister Keys trying to play the honest broker (and elections around the corner) with a known serial liar- it is high risk for him. Bainimarama is only interested in regime survival. A return to liberal democracy with the military back to barracks is totally off the cards with him.

His brand of militarism is here to stay. So many good RFMF officers have lost their careers to attest to this. So stop fooling yourselves.

We are in for a protracted predatory military rule with the façade of democracy. Fiji’s society has become one big espionage network which the regime is trying its best to spread overseas to New Zealand and Australia with its sympathizes.

This has been the mode of operating for dictatorial regimes of the past. In Fiji people spy on their neigbours in order to curry favour with the regime.

In Australia and New Zealand these coup apologists suffer from messianic delusions that Bainimarama has the magic bullet but really have revenge as their underlying motive.

Why are there so many draconian decrees? Obviously it facilitates a false sense of legitimacy at the same time grandstanding to the world that the peoples’ regimented silence is acquiescence.

 Why is the Land Force Commander defending the regime when you have a whole Ministry of Defence with Ganilau, his CEO etc that sits above him?

 Indeed making overt threats to society at large is predatory mentality of the lowest animal order. They need the military watchdog to keep barking to frighten the very tax payers who they owe their living to. Compounding this mentality, the PM and his predatory state has been very generous in dispensing with others, honest work tax dollars to the military for keeping national security intact!

The national dialogue forum set for February 2010 for want of a better phrase is “simply pissing in each others pockets”. The puppet of a CEO at the PM’s office say’s “No race based political organization should be represented”. Well if that’s the case they should exclude the military because it is now the most race based political institution ever created by mankind not only in Fiji but the world with 99 % Indigenous Fijians.

 Then again who cares, so long as we have our babakau and draunimoli tea.

Posted by Rachel Solivakasama

http://latestfijinews.blogspot.com/2010/02/bainimaramas-predatory-state.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FkwOP+%28Latest+Fiji+News+as+it+happens%29&utm_content=Google+Reader

Government challenged on Fiji stance Linda Mottram reported this story on  Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:31:00 

 ELEANOR HALL: An Australian academic is warning Canberra to tone down its rhetoric on Fiji and ease the sanctions that it imposed in response to the 2006 coup.

Instead, in a paper for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, professor Richard Herr says the Australian Government should re-engage with the Fiji military.

Professor Herr told Linda Mottram that the existing policy has not worked to bring back democracy and that the Australian-Fiji standoff is threatening regional unity.

RICHARD HERR: We see it with the issues of the headquarters. We see it over issues in terms of PACER (Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations) and PACER plus and the fact that Fiji really is unwilling to be excluded from issues which are central to its own economy and therefore has already begun to create difficulties of its own or at least play to the rules really more than anything else with regard to the forum secretariat.

That’s created other tensions that we’ve seen. Within the region there are those who are speaking about the forum secretariat itself as an agent of Australia – New Zealand policy which is clearly not in the two largest members of the forum’s interests.

LINDA MOTTRAM: Would you argue that Frank Bainimarama has the best interest of Fiji at heart?

RICHARD HERR: I don’t think it’s up for me to say. I can’t say that I know him intimately or his mind intimately. All I can say is that his assumption is that he is doing what he thinks Fiji should want and in that sense his overt program has been in the direction most have wanted for Fiji – that it’s a non-racial democratic Fiji free of corruption.

 LINDA MOTTRAM: None of that changes the fact though that in the Australian view this is a military leader who has abrogated the Constitution after overthrowing democracy and that is unacceptable. The Pacific is a democratic space and therefore the line in the sand is there must be a return to democracy. Why should that not be the continuing position of Australia?

RICHARD HERR: Well I think there’s no problem with that at all. Even (laughs) as I say that’s the Fijian Prime Minister’s position as well. It’s just that he believes that the process will now take until 2014 to do. In some ways he is, seems to be convinced in his own mind and in his public declarations that he has actually met the requirements of both the forum and the Commonwealth secretariat in laying down a roadmap for the return to democracy.

LINDA MOTTRAM: If Australia was to re-engage with Fiji it would be a major climb down.

RICHARD HERR: I’m not quite sure Linda that I could agree with that. What I haven’t suggested is a complete elimination of sanctions. Indeed even the Fiji Government hasn’t asked for that.

What I’ve suggested is that the sanctions that would be inappropriate within Australia, for example the victimisation of family members for the presumed sins of their fathers or husbands or whatever, should be removed because they’re simply inappropriate. We wouldn’t accept them in Australia for you or your family to be victimised if your parents had done something wrong. To apply a contrary principle abroad, that seems a curious way of restoring faith in the rule of law.

But this is not a one-way street. I mean it’s still the case that Fiji itself has to want to restore relations.

LINDA MOTTRAM: One of your other proposals regarding re-engagement is at the military level. Now that is going to be very contentious with the Australian Government. I mean obviously using military bans is a typical diplomatic tool against pariah regimes. Why shouldn’t that be the case in the case of Fiji?

RICHARD HERR: Well I mean it hasn’t been the case with all military regimes around the world first of all, so Fiji sees some inconsistency I guess in approach. But in this case the simple fact is that if we honestly believe that this is a military regime controlled entirely by the military, not talking to those that hold power seems to be somehow counterproductive, especially if we want them to listen to us.

ELEANOR HALL: That’s professor Richard Herr, the author of a paper for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute on Australian-Fiji relations. He was speaking to Linda Mottram.

http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2010/s2803671.htm

Share on Facebook » Share on Twitter »

Why aren’t you transparent about your decrees Aiyaz Khaiyum?

For hard evidence that we are becoming a secretive totalitarian police state look no further than the promulgation of decrees that constitute the law of the land under our military dictatorship.

But where can one get a handle on the 40-odd decrees that have been promulgated since abrogation of the Constitution on 10 April 2009? There’s no trace of them on the government website.

The only location we know of is a partial list on the website of the Pacific Islands Legal Information Institute, which operates under the aegis of the School of Law at the University of the South Pacific.

Folks, this begs the question: Why the secrecy?

Is it because of crass incompetence (no surprise there)? Or is it a case of deliberate deceit (no surprise there, either!)?

If forced to choose between the conspiracy theory and the stuff-up theory, we strongly suspect the former. This is because the regime used to publish its decrees, in chronological order, on the government website. Then, mysteriously, they disappeared.

Clearly the illegal attorney-general, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum had a big problem with the detail of his decrees being scrutinised.

Was he worried, perhaps, that trained lawyers might see legal loopholes in the hastily drafted laws?

Even from the incomplete list on the School of Law website it’s not difficult to see that many of the Decrees have been shoddily drafted and could not be regarded as being legally concise.

For example, there are four Decrees that contain corrections to the Income Tax Decree, which does not appear on the site. And the Citizenship Decree of 14 April 2009 has been re-written as the Citizenship of Fiji decree, this time dated 6 July 2009.

Or is Aiyaz worried that we ordinary people will see just how draconian and unjust his laws really are? Or is he trying to hide them from scrutiny by foreign media and would-be investors?

That would certainly explain why we have never sighted the Crime Decree or the Regulation of National Spectrum Decree.

The Spectrum Decree, for instance, gives the dictatorship life and death powers over commercial broadcasters, some of whom have considerable capital at stake.

Moreover, one of the key provisions of the Decree is that no one can contest its provisions in a court of law.

That much we know. Aiyaz is keeping a tight lid on the rest, although he couldn’t help bragging about his new Media Decree.

Once we get that, our dictatorship will have finally transformed our beloved nation into a fully-fledged totalitarian police state.

That, folks, will be a damning reality, one which Bainimarama and Aiyaz will never be able to conceal, no matter how many lies they tell.

Fiji Democracy Now

We have decided to run a full article as written by Samisoni Pareti Island Business.

We believe it is important to get a glimpse from an expert that writes professionally and projects [or tries to] a balance view.

FTCM Team 

Read more;

COVER STORY: REVEALED: PM’S PLAN FOR TALKS, ELECTIONS Fresh nationwide dialogue brought forward to February Samisoni Pareti Fiji is not going for an early election date despite the bringing forward to next month of a nationwide dialogue forum. Permanent Secretary in the Prime Ministers Office, Colonel Pio Tikoduadua stressed this in an interview he gave FIJI BUSINESS. Whilst he admitted that beginning fresh nationwide dialogue forum next month would come as a surprise to some, the government he said is still committed to its September 2014 poll date as announced in the July 1, 2009 address of Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama. “At this point in time we are saying 2014 (for elections),” said Tikoduadua.

 “That’s our position so far even though there have been pressure from all sides to call for elections prior to 2014. “We think that some concurrent activity can happen between now and 2012 in order to create a better shape of what would become perhaps the future political engagement in Fiji.”

That political engagement is a reference to political consultations Bainimarama spoke about during his July 1, 2009 address. Under his Strategic Framework For Change timeline, consultations for a new constitution should commence September 2012 and the document should be ready by September 2013, exactly 12 months before the poll date.

“Consultations with various stakeholders for the drafting of the new constitution shall…commence in September 2012,” Bainimarama had said then. “These consultations shall be extensive and will not just be limited to political parties. It shall include civil society including NGOs and citizens of our country.

 “Consultations shall include discussions on the size of the new parliament, appropriateness of a bi-cameral system, length of the term of office of a government and the systems of checks and balances. “The new constitution must be in place at least a year before the September 2014 elections—in other words by September 2013. “This will give all Fijians and candidates for the elections ample time to familiarise themselves with the provisions of the constitution. “The constitution shall be translated into vernacular languages and pocket sizes shall be available.”

But that consultation has been brought forward by almost two years, although both Tikoduadua and Attorney-General Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum insisted that the move does not in any way change the 2014 election date.

“There is no connection between the 2014 election date and the bringing forward of the dialogue,” Sayed-Khaiyum told this magazine.

“The dialogue is really the precursor to the September 2012 consultations. This is just another avenue. The September 2014 date still stays.” Tikoduadua, on the other hand, was adamant that real political consultations about the makeup of the new constitution would not start next month, but on the Bainimarama prescribed date of September 2012. Between now and then, this National Dialogue for Fiji’s Future (NDFF) would commence with an “open” agenda that will have to be decided by both the NDFF Secretariat and its yet-to-be appointed chair.

“They will have to cook up something to kick off discussions, they have to start at some point,” said Tikoduadua. “We are leaving that to the secretariat plus the chairman when he comes in. The idea is to get people under one roof; meet and greet and then throw in something as a starting point which the chairman and the secretariat need to work out. “They can gauge their way from there and go forward. What we would like to see is for the forum to develop further into what could become a consultative body for the new constitution by way of input.”

 The senior military officer, who was Bainimarama’s staff officer during the 2000 coup that was fronted by George Speight, declined to disclose who they are eyeing to take up the chair of NDFF. Asked about rumours that the job would go to former Fiji government official, Peter Thompson, Tikoduadua said: “Who’s that? “Oh, I thought I will be the first one to know, no, no, no. I haven’t heard anything about Peter Thompson.”

All he said was that the chair would be someone independent and would not be a member of a political party in Fiji. This meant that an appointee could come from abroad, which was in line with calls made by the international community. Some overseas governments, Tikoduadua said, had even suggested names. He also declined to reveal the identities of individuals and organisations that have submitted their interest to participate in the NDFF. All he could say was that he had seen some “interesting” applications.

Deadline for the submission of interest in NDFF participation was set for Christmas Eve and Tikoduadua’s office should be releasing more information on its membership before the end of this month. Will NDFF members comprise mainly former members of the National Council for the Building of a Better Fiji that produced Bainimarama’s People’s Charter for Change? “Oh no, these are new people. Interesting people. Well, I saw the Methodist Church letterhead for example. I assume they would like to participate in the forum.”

 In announcing the commencement of the NDFF on February 2010, Tikoduadua said people or organisations that participate in the dialogue must meet four basic prerequisites. They have to be forward looking and have the best interest of Fiji at heart, the views they bring to the forum should not be inconsistent with the people’s charter for change, they don’t have an outstanding case before the courts and neither should they represent a political party that espouses ethnic based politics.

Some of these criteria automatically rule out politicians like ousted Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase and his former education minister, the Roko Tui Dreketi Ro Teimumu Kepa. Both have cases still before the High Court and the Magistrate’s Court respectively. It could not be ascertained by press time whether any member of Qarase’s Soqosoqo Duavata ni Lewenivanua Party nor that of the Fiji Labour Party or National Federation Party had applied to be part of the NDFF.

Said Tikoduadua: “Let me tell you why we want civic participation and not political parties. In our view, the people have spoken through the charter and a lot of things have been raised through the state of the nation and the economy report. “Their discussions will bear on some political issues, I mean you can’t really separate political issues from the people’s discussions. “That is going to come through but as long as they don’t go in and try to further their own political party agendas. “If there is a unifying voice coming from that community-based discussions about what they think and where they think Fiji should be heading, then politicians should take heed of it.”

From the last consultation process the Bainimarama Government had embarked on, Tikoduadua said it got 60 percent of the people’s support. This NDFF, he hoped, would build on that support, and the senior Bainimarama aide has urged for wider and greater participation. “As I told some members of the diplomatic community, the Prime Minister has said no dialogue until 2012 yet he has brought it forward now. “So don’t try to kill it off even before allowing it any chance to start growing, start developing it to something.”

At least one foreign government seems to have taken up Tikoduadua’s plea. Speaking to national television late last month, Indian High Commissioner in Fiji Professor Prabhakara Jha said New Delhi stands ready to offer Fiji support for the holding of elections with no strings attached. “Anything concerning the general election, we are ready to assist,” High Commissioner Jha told Fiji Television. “Any help, any sort of gift, any sort of assistance, whether its experience, technical whatever, we stand ready with unconditional support.”

http://www.islandsbusiness.com/fiji_business/index_dynamic/containerNameToReplace=MiddleMiddle/focusModuleID=18993/overideSkinName=issueArticle-full.tpl

Democracy vs. Coups

http://hubpages.com/hub/Coup-detat-French-Word–Fijian-Reality-

Throughout history and in all parts of the world there have been several times governments were overthrown. Whether the government was oppressive to its citizens economically, politically or culturally, revolutions, successful or failed, can be seen as people standing up for their rights. Those who take part in revolutions are seen as heroes and martyrs. For example, in recent times, many would herald the efforts of students in communist China to reform to a democratic government as heroic. While their attempts in 1989 failed to overthrow the government, and resulted in many deaths in Tiananmen square and several arrests after the fact, their actions are typically seen as noble and as effecting the change of China from an exclusive authoritarian state, one that takes no interest in public opinion, to an inclusive or consultative authoritarian state, meaning they accept public opinion but ultimately have the final say. Even the United States has its origins in a revolution seen as noble. The players in the United States’ revolutionary war are honored and studied today as heroes and fathers of a nation.

However, there is a darker side of overthrowing governments in which the players are not always seen as heroes. This darker side’s name has origins in France, when Napoleon Bonaparte used military force to overthrow the existing legislating branch and eventually proclaim himself emperor. This darker side of government reform, called “Coup d`etat” or coup, is often seen as an enemy to democracy and order, and while the name has French origins from around the late 18th century, its actions can date back to Caesar and perhaps before. No part of the globe has been safe from either revolutions or coups, not even in the beautiful and serene atmosphere of the Pacific. In fact, coups happen to play a very significant role in the make-up of the modern pacific island nation of Fiji and are not only something of the past but also a real problem of the present.

 

Pre-Modern Fiji

Early Fijian history consists of mostly tribes or family-groups co-existing together sometimes peacefully, sometimes not. These family-groups, whether friend or foe, did not remain solitary from one another and often voyaged to other island systems. Deryck Scarr writes in his book Fiji: A Short History, “Fifteen or sixteen hundred years before the birth of Christ, there flourished a voyaging people with no navigational aids other than the stars and their own acute observation of bird movements and ocean swells.” Scarr goes on to say, “This epic voyaging was all the more remarkable because there was no evident economic need to undertake it. The voyagers were well fed. Pig, chicken, rat, dog, a range of fish and relatively plentiful turtle remains have been found in a rock shelter on Yanuca islet, off southern Viti Levu, where occupation is dated back to 1590 BC” (1).

Early Fijians traded not only goods with Samoa and Tonga, but also people. Perhaps one reason why Fijians could identify with these two groups of islanders was because unlike most of Melanesia, that has a big man system; many groups in Fiji adopted a chiefly system, believing that their chiefs were of divine ancestral descent. Much of the Fijian nobility would marry into the nobility of these other two island groups or even trade people for slaves. Fijians practiced cannibalism and a common greeting from a commoner to a chief was, “Eat me!” Fijians lived happily with their own culture before any influence of the western world graced their shores. However, when the “white world” did land in Fiji, changes would start to take place that began many of the problems the coups of today are rooted in.

British Colonization

 ”The Dutch explorer Abel Tasman visited Fiji in 1643 while looking for the Great Southern Continent. It was not until the nineteenth century, however, that Europeans settled the islands permanently” (“Fiji”). Early contacts Fijians had with the white man were either traders or missionaries. Traders were easy enough to deal with for many Fijians; however missionaries challenged the authority of ruling chiefs. Scarr writes of an instance where this challenge of authority hit a chief’s boiling point. “As Tui Cakau once demanded, in a fit of anger at missionary preaching, was Jehovah the god of bodies killed for eating? Because the Cakaudrove ancestor Mai Natavasara was such a god, he must be superior. And through the 1840s all the wealth of a complex chiefdom obeying its own gods was on display to missionaries at Tui Cakau’s seat, Somosomo” (14). In fact, the only reason this chief, Tui Cakau, allowed the missionaries presence in his chiefdom was because his son had joined the faith. His son said, “Their religion must be true because muskets were real enough,” believing that the former might be key to possession of the latter (Scarr 14). Over the next 30 years, Christianity would slowly grow in popularity and bring more and more Europeans to the shores of Fiji. “The islands came under British control as a colony in 1874, and the British brought over Indian contract laborers” (“Fiji”).

The plantation market was growing in the pacific islands in the mid to late 1800s. Planters came to the islands not in search of trade or souls, but to set up shop and stay. Coffee, copra, vanilla, sugar cane, some fruits, cotton and rubber were among the crops that could be grown in the pacific climate, however many of the native islanders found the task of plantation life tedious and undesirable. This caused planters to have to bring in outside labor. The British, seeking to get the most profit out of their Fijian colony, desided it would be best to bring laborers in from British-governed India. In 1879 Sir Aurthor Gordon from England was head of the government in Fiji and passed the four-to-ten ratio on Indian migrants which would allow families of Indians to form in Fiji. Judith Bennett says, “This was the flaw of Gordon’s plan, for it provided the potential for a new class of landless proletarians within Fijian society” (Macdonald 173-178). This new class would form and laid the ground work for the most recent coups in Fiji.

George Speight

Fiji’s Three-legged Stool

Ratu Sir Lala Sukuna depicted Fiji as a three-legged stool that stood in balance. Fijians owned the land, Indians provided the labor, and Europeans managed the government. In reality, this three-legged stool was very out of balance. The politics that surrounded Fiji’s Independence from Great Britian in the late 1960’s, almost 100 years after Indians were first brought to Fiji, were not based on politics at all, but rather were based on race. Fijians fought to dominat the government in order to keep in place policies that would protect their land, while Indians (who outnumbered Fijians at the time) sought for political and social rights. Even in the way that the newly independent government in 1970 was set up in Fiji reflected the innate racist notions that existed at the time. Fijians were to have a certain number of seats and Indians were to have a certain number of seats, while a few seats were up for grabs to whoever. It is no wonder that a short time after the independence of Fiji, two different coups occurred in 1987 as different races and peoples struggled for dominance in a nation wrought with divisions. Fijians and Indians lived together harboring their prejudices for almost another ten years before they would turn into aggression and more coups.

In late 1990’s the counrty returned to a democratic government and in 1999 Mr. Mahendra Chaundry, the first Indo-Fijian, was elected Prime Minister. A seemingly amazing step toward equality of the races in Fiji would be squashed, however, a year later when Fiji would endure its third military coup. “May 19, 2000, a group of men led by George Speight held the government men hostage inside the parlimentary complex. Mr. Chaundry and other labor members of the government were held hostage for 56 days” (“A Race for Rights”). George Speight announced a press conference shortly after taking the Prime Minister hostage in which he stated to the world that he revoked the constitution, revoked the powers of the president, and claimed that he would now hold all executive powers. In the documentary, “A Race for Rights”, Produced and Directed by Larry Thomas, an indeginous Fijian says that Speight was a failed business man with little credibility among his peers in the western world, educated abroad, spoke mostly English, was hardly involved in any of the cultural affairs in which Fijians participate, and yet often embraced as a savior by indegenous Fijians. The coup was non-violent, however, idegenous Fijians throughout the country quickly turned to violence in their demonstrations of support to take out their aggressions and frustrations with the Indian occupation. Indo-Fijian homes were burned and stores were looted as riots broke out in the streets of Fiji. A new Prime Minister was appointed by the military government and Mr. Chaundry was released which stabalized the nation for a few years, however, the false stablity could not last.

[to be continued...]

 December 8, 2009

When Mohammed Aziz recently confirmed that FMF personnel were getting a backdated “ration allowance” entitlement covering the period 2006-2008, he didn’t tell the whole truth.

Quoted by Fiji Village in a news item dated 25 November 2009, Aziz refused to say how much the payout involved. In fact, the total payout has been estimated at more than $7-million.

Needless to say, Aziz called it a ‘ration allowance” to disguise its true purpose, which was to make FMF personnel feel better about supporting Frank Bainimarama’s illegal dictatorship.

That’s why our Fiji freedom blogs refer to this ‘ration allowance” as “blood money” or “conscience money”.

 The other fact that Colonel Aziz chose not to reveal was that the “ration allowance” is only the tip of a very big allowance iceberg.

In fact, a total of 11 “allowances” are gazetted for FMF personnel.

We know this because three days before the abrogation of the Constitution, when we had a relatively free media, Fiji Village published a list of gazetted allowances in a news item dated 7 April 2009 under the headline, “Military Allowances on hold”.

The other allowances are: Field Allowance, Seagoing Allowance, Remote Location Allowance, Explosive Allowance, Diving Allowance, Transfer Allowance, Hotel Meal Allowance, Sevusevu Allowance(!), Transport Allowance and Leave Allowance.

This very revealing piece of information has long been pulled from the Fiji Village website, but not before it was spotted by the sharp-eyed Discombobulated Bubu, who downloaded the news item and emailed it to FDN.

The questions the Fiji Village news item raises are: how much are these allowances, who are they paid to and on what pretext?

For example, will the dictator claim “Remote Location Allowance” when he is in faraway Copenhagen, or was he using his “Sevusevu Allowance” to formally welcome himself back home when he drank himself into a stupor in Traps in the wee hours of Friday 21 November?

We know that officially recorded expenditure by our military has blown out by nearly 50 per cent since the coup three years ago.

 But, until the dictator and his cronies are finally brought to book, we will never know how much taxpayer money has been creamed off under the pretext of various “allowance” entitlements.

Folks, don’t forget that our former government was right onto Bainimarama over the way he abused his position as Commander of the RFMF by using it to create his own secret gravy train.

Now that’s Frank’s in charge, the gravy train is at full throttle.

But he and Colonel Aziz know only to well that what they are doing is criminal. That’s why they keep trotting out the absurd lie that their gravy train is only delivering “allowances” to which they are entitled.

And for playing his part, Aziz gets bumped up to Brigadier.

Such is life (for some) on Frank’s corrupt gravy train.

Fiji Democracy Now

Posted by rawfijinews 

————————————————————

 Hard road ahead for Fiji!

December 8, 2009

Quite right JB and qasex.But these arguments and comments assume that Frank and his thugs are interested in the progress of Fiji while they are wholly consumed by self interest. And while a few of these so-called officers may have had a dinner or two at Sandhurst or Duntroon they cannot be described as scholar soldiers. Otherwise they would recognise the lessons of history.

Go back to the much trumpeted People’s Charter. What do we hear of it now? At that time it seemed the junta wanted to build a Suharto-style state with the charter as their Pancasila or national philosophy which quite simply meant that the army ran everything from the civil service to the media to the business life of the nation.

 That has certainly happened. The army now runs the country, the media, the civil service, even the stock exchange (and poor old FHL)through a corrupted reserve bank which now offers tragically unrealistic growth projections. It’s a lie. They know it’s a lie (or should know). The people of Fiji know it’s a lie. The outside world knows it’s a lie. Wadan Narsey’s latest analysis is relevant here.

The question now is what happens when the money runs out? Even if the military manages to steal the FNPF funds – which seems likely – it won’t sustain their mad spending. The junta probably fondly imagines that there’s $2bn there to be had. But it’s just not so. That money represents investments, not cash, and those investments sit there valued as book assets. To liquidate them in a hurry there would be a fire sale with all that that entails. Oh sure, they could insist that book values are realised through control of public money but that’s a pass the parcel game and when the music stops, what then?

The plain fact is that Fiji’s treasure – financial, social and political – is being squandered by a bunch of thieves.

It will only end when there is no more money to be stolen by which time the businesses who for their survival have come around to the junta will have transferred every cent they can to their increasingly attractive offshore entities.

It’s grim prospect. The junta will use more and more public money to prop up “friendly” businesses such as the proposed TV station, making the classic mistake of thinking that because it’s in the media people will see, hear, read it and believe it.

It reminds me of when in my trade union days I went on a fraternal visit to Soviet Russia when one of the samizdat (pre-internet underground papers much like this site which I was not supposed to read) put it so succinctly: They pretend to tell us and we pretend to know. Is this Fiji’s future – a regime disconnected from the people it purports to serve? Sadly, it seems to be so.

For who will stand up against the guns? Not the business community whose interest, rightly in my view, is to carry on employing people while making the most of a bad situation. Certainly not the body politic which is divided as ever and cowed by fear of violence. Not now the media which is silenced by censorship, willingly in a number of quite disgraceful cases. And certainly not the warrior race who have become rabbits in the headlights.

Then who? The answer probably is the money. For when it runs out, which it will sooner than the goons think, who will pay those 4,000 squaddies? Not China, that’s for sure.

If there’s a scholar left in the MC he or she would do well to re-read Niccolo Machiavelli’s remark that there are no unpaid loyal people. There’s a hard road ahead for Fiji.

Posted by rawfijinews 

———————————————————–

Paul Reeves needs a reality check

December 7, 2009

Commonwealth Special Representative to Fiji Sir Paul Reeves needs to take a more realistic look at what is happening in Fiji.

He is calling on New Zealand to change its hard line foreign policy stance on Fiji, to lift off travel bans and to re-engage with a military government that is stubborn, insensitive and repressive.

 His simplistic view of the Fiji situation is discouraging to say the least to us in Fiji who are forced to live daily with human rights repressions in the form of severe restrictions on freedom of expression and media rights and the inability to openly comment on government policies that are devastating the lives of our people.

The PER is used to curb any form of resistance or dissent. Arbitrary arrests and brutalization of anyone who dares to raise a voice of dissent is the order of the day. There are reports of cane farmers being subjected to abuses like old men made to run around the army camp in the mid-day heat, even violent assaults, from army personnel while they have been cruelly marginalized from their own industry.

 The economy is in deep trouble, unemployment high and the cost of living continues to spiral out of control. Insensitive government policies such as allowing bus fare increases and the removal of some 140-odd items from price control will send more of our struggling poor to the poverty heap.

Government fees and charges on services to the public have spiralled within a year to meet the requirements of a severely cash-strapped administration. While the country is going to the dogs, the prime minister is having a grand time trotting the globe on any pretext he can jerk up … he is barely in the country these days!

Despite all the spin about clamping down on corruption, the dictator, his close ministers and senior military officers are reportedly as much on the take as those they earlier denounced.

Paul Reeves needs to start looking behind the rhetoric being spewed out by the dictator and his henchmen to see where actually Fiji is headed on the third anniversary of the December 2006 takeover. In three years, the situation in the country has worsened, the future looks even more bleak.

 He wants New Zealand, and no doubt the Commonwealth, to enter into dialogue with a man who is illogically stubborn, and refusing to move an inch in considering an acceptable and realistic timeline to return Fiji to democracy and constitutional rule.

 Is Sir Paul trying to tell the international community and the people of Fiji that it will take five years to carry out reforms and hold general elections? Is he telling the world that only Frank Bainimarama and his cohorts in the military council know what is right for Fiji?

As the Comsec’s Special Representative to Fiji, Sir Paul’s first responsibility is to uphold the values and principles of the Commonwealth re-iterated last week in the Trinidad Tobago Affirmation of the Values and Principles of the Commonwealth.

Comsec might one to re-think whether Sir Paul has not comprised himself as his Special Representative to Fiji to help it chart a way out of its current political crisis.

If anything, the international community needs to take a reality check of the current Fiji situation and stop pussy-footing with our future. Sanctions need to be stepped up to force the dictator to a more realistic roadmap to return Fiji to democracy and to get rid of the repugnant Public Emergency Regulations.

Posted by rawfijinews 

—————————————————————–

Frank’s goons racist at heart by calling Brij Lal a “turncoat girmit baini” and Warden Narsey as an “Uncle Tom Indian

December 7, 2009

After threats and violence comes ugly racism as the favoured weapon for Bainimarama’s goons

The dictator makes a big deal of justifying his rape of democracy by telling the United Nations and international TV audiences that it’s all about creating racial unity.

But his message has yet to reach his hard-line supporters.

On a daily basis they are exposing Frank’s pious posturing on racial unity as the cynical lie we have always known it to be.

Tune into Bainimarama’s rusted-on disciples, specifically the goons in Media Cell who venture onto the freedom blogs to espouse the regime’s cause, and you’ll know exactly what we are talking about.

In their efforts to refute the damning facts about Bainimarama and his regime, they are stirring the racist pot for all they are worth.

A ready example can be found in the comments posted against articles on Fiji freedom blogger, Coup Four And A Half.

In a commendable display of democracy and free speech, the blog has a policy of not blocking pro-regime comments, no matter how offensive, illogical and racist they may be.

Recently, the blog ran articles by Professors Waden Narsey and Brij Lal, each one a sharp and telling critique that exposed the incompetence and falsehoods that are the hallmarks of Bainimarama’s dictatorship.

 The two articles sparked a minor fury of postings by the Media Cell goons.

But instead of mounting well constructed arguments against the two academics, they chose instead to wallow in the gutter of racism and make an issue of Narsey and Lal’s ethnicity.

“Turncoat Girmit Baini Brij Lal” is what one goon posted, blogging as “Anonymous”. A second anonymous poster described Narsey and Lal as “two Uncle Tom Indians”.

But who’s surprised by the fact that the regime’s supporters are so ready to play the racist card?

Most of them are drawn from the ranks of the RFMF, which is 99 per cent ethnic Fijian, making it the nation’s most manifestly racist institution.

And how does that fact square with the dictator’s holier-than-thou public utterances?

The answer, of course, is that it doesn’t. But achieving racial unity has never been on the dictator’s real agenda.

Like “cleaning up corruption” the “racial unity” platform is another example of spin cranked up by Frank Bainimarama to conceal his true purpose in life, which is gaining protection from due process.

You know folks, we almost feel grateful to Frank’s racist attack dogs!

After all, they are playing no small part in helping the wider world to fully grasp the unsavoury truth about a despicable dictator who is relentlessly destroying our beloved nation.

Fiji Democracy Now

Posted by rawfijinews

—————————————————————-

Fiji’s inflation rate expected at 15.2% and not Sada Reddy’s blatant lie of 7%

December 7, 2009 The Reserve Bank is way off the mark in its inflation forecasts which is likely to be running closer to an unprecedented high of 15.2% and not the RBF-claimed 7%.

Likewise, to claim that devaluation of the Fiji dollar has resulted in benefits to the economy is a horrendous misrepresentation. In fact, devaluation has not benefited the economy. Nor has it enhanced Fiji’s Foreign Reserves.

The practice worldwide is to express Reserves in one of the globally accepted international currencies. The US dollar is the most commonly used currency in this respect. Devaluation of the Fiji dollar by 20% last April resulted in the depreciation of our currency vis a vis the US dollar. Thus, our reserves received an artificial boost but the in actual fact there was no change in our foreign reserves position when measured in US dollars or in the currencies of our major trading partners.

 All our imports are paid for in foreign currency, largely in Australian, NZ, US dollars or the Japanese Yen. The net effect of the devaluation, therefore, is that more Fiji dollars will now be needed to settle our import bills in these foreign currencies. Devaluation will also add to the burden of servicing our foreign currency debts. Over a longer period, it will have done more harm than good to the economy.

The argument that devaluation has increased our competitiveness in the international market place is of little significance if we look at what we export. Hardly any of our exports would have benefited from the devaluation. Not even the tourism sector. With its heavily discounted rates, tourism is not likely to bring in any enhanced earnings. Indeed, tourism receipts for 2009 are estimated by official sources to be significantly below that of 2008.

On the other hand, devaluation has inflicted greater hardship on the local people. It has resulted in galloping inflation as prices of virtually every thing went up significantly, hitting the poor amongst us the hardest. As a direct consequence of the devaluation rub off, traders and vendors of local goods and services also jacked up their prices. These increased prices are way above any increase one would expect from a 20% devaluation.

It is obvious that the business community has taken undue advantage of the devaluation to send prices skyrocketing

The claim therefore that inflation is “currently running at around 7% and will moderate at around 2% by the end of 2010” is absolutely ridiculous. Ask anyone on the street and he/she will tell you that prices of almost everything have soared beyond belief since devaluation.

A recent survey by the Consumer Council of Fiji revealed that prices of many items in daily use in every household had gone up by 100% and, in some cases, by as much as 200%.

So where does the 7% inflation rate fit in? In the past three months bus fares and electricity rates have gone up. So has the price of fuel. Food, energy and transport are the major components of the Consumer Price Index. When prices have doubled or even trebled how can the RBF talk about 7% inflation rate? It is laughable.

With the removal of price controls as announced in the 2010 Budget, inflation is going to worsen. A weak economy and a subdued export sector will exert more pressure on the dollar and likely further erode its purchasing power.

So to be more accurate inflation is more likely to be running in double digits rather than the 7% and 2% projected by the Reserve Bank.

 It would be a lot more palatable if the RBF were to admit the truth rather than engage in vain attempts to paint a bright picture of a bleak scenario. – Fiji Labour Party

From Raw Fiji News Blog: An expert view.http://rawfijinews.wordpress.com/

Thursday, December 3, 2009

’ Professor Brij Lal spoke to Green Left Weekly’s Aaron Roden about the character and contradictions of Fiji’s military dictatorship, led by coup leader Frank Bainimarama.

You’ve said the essence of Bainimarama’s 2006 coup is no different to the previous coups in Fiji’s history, even though past coups were largely based on establishing power for the Fijian ethnic majority. What do you mean by this?

Bainimarama justified his 2006 coup as a “clean-up campaign”, not a military coup. Well, it was a military coup that deposed a democratically elected government. And no one has been prosecuted for corruption in the last two years.

I don’t think anyone now seriously believes in this narrative anymore. As time has gone on, it has become increasingly clear that this is a military coup and that the military is intent on retaining its power.

I doubt very much if the military will voluntarily relinquish power to a civilian authority. More likely, we are likely to see a militarised democracy in Fiji where the military will have a visible presence in the governance of the country.

In April, the regime annulled the constitution. Can you comment on the motivations behind this?

The abrogation of the constitution was not surprising. It was observed more in the breach from the day the coup was [carried out] in December 2006. What it has done is to enable the military to do things unfettered by legal niceties, without having to justify its actions and policies in a court of law.

The country is ruled by decree and the most important of the decrees cannot be challenged in a court of law. It gives the interim administration a free hand to do the things it wants.

And there is a public emergency regulation in place that curtails the freedom of the media and the freedom of speech. Dissent is suppressed through censorship and self-censorship.

Is a new constitution likely?

Three years have gone by, but the military has not shown its hand about what kind of a constitution it wants for the country.

A week ago, the interim administration said they would convene a dialogue forum about the future. But political parties and political leaders who do not subscribe to the military’s rendition of events will be excluded, [unlike] selected non-government organisations and community leaders.

Such a restrictive approach is counterproductive and will not fool anyone. It goes to the heart of the legitimacy of the project.

I think it is important for the military to declare its hand and engage in good-faith negotiation with the principal stakeholders about the future. Going it alone unilaterally will not address the fundamental problems of Fiji.

Australian diplomats, as well as yourself, were kicked out of the country recently for “interfering”. Why did the regime do this?

I think most people in Fiji, including in the department of foreign affairs in Fiji, were surprised by the expulsion of the diplomats. Just a week before, Fiji’s diplomatic status in Australia was formalised, so expelling the [Australian] High Commissioner [to Fiji] did not make sense.

I think most people in Fiji know that a few [high-placed] individuals in the interim administration have a vendetta against Australia because of the travel bans that have been imposed upon them, and they are motivated by a sense of revenge and retribution.

I don’t think this situation will last long and that diplomatic relations will be restored. Fiji cannot simply ignore the realities of geography and history.

Is Bainimarama dangerously isolating Fiji?

I think there is a willingness in the international community to engage with Fiji, but there has to be some willingness on the part of the authorities in Fiji to engage in a genuine dialogue.

It is not only Australia and New Zealand that have expressed reservations about what is happening in Fiji. The Pacific Islands Forum, the Commonwealth and the European Union all have done the same.

Blaming the international community will not resolve Fiji’s difficulties. Sadly, the deepening isolation of Fiji is self-inflicted.

Is the dictatorship guilty of human rights abuses?

No one in Fiji would deny that breaches of human rights occur regularly, such as the harassment of sugar cane growers by the military. But there is complete media censorship in Fiji, and the public emergency regulations curtail the freedom of speech and movement.

There is a yawning gap between the regime’s [democratic] rhetoric and the reality on the ground. People must be given an opportunity to engage in a dialogue about the major issues facing Fiji and the way these can be resolved.

The regime’s proposed “People’s Charter” appears to be a progressive initiative, with some noble principles that try to address racial discrimination, such as “one person, one vote”. However, despite its democratic aspirations, it has no democratic mandate. Does it stand a chance, and is Fiji ready for such progress?

The so-called People’s Charter is essentially a plan drawn up by a few hand-picked people, many of whom have no mandate from the groups they purport to represent.

It contains some good things, but you did not have to have a coup to embrace its principles. There is nothing in the charter that is not in the constitution.

The 1997 constitution enshrined the principle of power-sharing among the principal ethnic groups in Fiji. It acknowledged the realities on the ground and the burden of Fiji’s racially divided history.

It was moving in the right direction. You can change the electoral system to anything you like, but the fundamental problem will still have to be addressed, which is respect for the rule of law. Unless you have that, there will be no stability in Fiji whatever electoral system you have.

Posted by Pacific in the Media at 6:45 AM

http://coupfourpointfive.blogspot.com/2009/12/fiji-military-is-intent-on-retaining.html

 Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum driven by his racist agenda

 November 23, 2009

We all know jokes about crooked lawyers. But there is nothing funny about our illegal attorney-general, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum.

Least funny is the way his actions are driven by his pathological antagonism towards Fiji indigenous institutions, demonstrated most recently by his Regulation of National Spectrum Decree.

We’ll get to the background of Aiyaz’s racist attitudes, but first let’s examine the frightening ramifications of the illegal attorney-general’s latest move.

In a nutshell, the new Decree gives Aiyaz the power to strip the licenses of broadcasters, potentially costing investors millions of dollars if their companies are de-licensed.

Khaiyum has made no secret of his distaste for our dominant television broadcaster, Fiji TV, which is owned by Yasana Holdings, representing the 14 ethnic Fijian provinces.

 Together with his younger brother, Riyaz Sayed-Khaiyum, head of the government-owned FBCL (Radio Fiji), Aiyaz has been plotting for months to set up a rival pro-regime television station.

Now the National Spectrum Decree provides the means to do that effortlessly and Fiji TV, which also owns the monopoly Papua New Guinea TV broadcaster EMTV, is a sitting duck.

Under the provisions of the Decree it would require only the stroke of a pen for the Khaiyum brothers to re-allocate or demand a share of Fiji TV’s frequencies in order to put their new television station to air.

There would be no need for investment in transmission towers or reception antennas. Under the Decree it’s all there for the taking.

And under the provisions of Aiyaz’s Decree the management of Fiji could face up to five years jail if they refuse to cooperate in the hijacking of their broadcasting facilities, which represent millions of dollars worth of honest investment.

In any other society such a blatantly corrupt act would be theft, pure and simple. But under the latest dodgy decree hastily concocted by Aiyaz it’s all within the law!

Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum has certainly come a long way in a short time. When he jumped onto Bainimarama’s bandwagon following the armed coup, he was a relative nobody.

His main claims to fame were his legal qualifications and his well known antipathy for traditional Fijian cultural values. In particular, he had long had his sights set on dismantling the chiefly system, which lies at the very core of those values.

This is what he proposed in his university thesis in Hong in 2002 when setting out his case to dismantle the Bose Levu Vakaturaga (Great Council of Chiefs):

“. . . The Chiefly system must go. Cultural autonomy must have a sunset clause .. . ”

 The sons of long-time NFP politician, Sayed Abdul Khaiyum, Aiyaz and Riyaz have each done well very out of the coup and the Bainimarama dictatorship.

Two years ago, and despite having no business experience, Riyaz, a former Fiji TV journalist, was suddenly elevated by the regime to the position of CEO of Fiji Broadcasting Corporation.

But not everyone in the dictatorship thinks the sun shines out of the Sayed-Khaiyum brothers, notably the majority of senior RFMF officers that make up the Military Council that was established by the dictator immediately after the coup.

As well as privately deploring the way in which Aiyaz has used the coup to build his illicit powerbase, they are especially sensitive to Aiyaz’s racist attitudes towards ethnic Fijians.

Given that the RFMF is nearly 99 percent composed of ethnic Fijians, the military’s hostile suspicion of the brash and vain young Aiyaz hardly comes as a surprise.

But Aiyaz has never had much time for the military, either. As he wrote in his thesis for his Hong Kong law degree in 2002 when analyzing the 2000 (Speight) coup:

 “…a a rescue of the prime minister and cabinet by the Fiji Military Forces, which prides itself in its military prowess, was an obvious and relatively easy task. However this was not to be. The ineptitude, inertia and reluctance displayed by the military in the first few weeks of the crisis allowed the kidnappers a free hand…”

 Well, the Military Council certainly didn’t display “‘ineptitude, inertia and reluctance” in demanding the dictator sack his then interim Minister for Finance, Mahendra Chaudhry.

But does the Military Council have the balls to insist the dictator deals similarly with the out-of-control illegal attorney-general?

Fiji Democracy Now

——————————————————————————–

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

Aiyaz Khaiyum and Riyaz Khaiyum’s corruptive move

Aiyaz Khaiyum’s wishful thinking

 Racist Agenda – NAFTA-gate and Passportgate; Privacy the new frontier for t…

Don’t Labour/Fabians pay over £3000 to repatriate folk- Were they not in… Posted by rawfijinews

 One Response to “Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum driven by his racist agenda”

natapoa said November 24, 2009 at 12:19 am

This decree does not as yet appear on the Fiji Govt website. Perhaps this is not surprising. How will it affect the other parts of the radio spectrum – Emergency services frequencies, VHF Marine bands, HF Marine bands, Amateur Radio bands and so on. If the excuse for revoking the broadcast licences is the necessity for an overhaul of the radio spectrum surely such an overhaul should not be limited to broadcast bands. If so that is clearly a move to stop broadcasting stations operating. On the other hand, if such an overhaul affects all means of communication it is an even more serious issue

 http://rawfijinews.wordpress.com/2009/11/23/aiyaz-sayed-khaiyum-driven-by-his-racist-agenda/

Anthony Gates letter to Frank Bainimarama resulting in ANZ envoy expulsion November 20, 2009 SUPREME COURT OF FIJI 3 November 2009 The Hon the Prime Minister Commodore Frank Bainimarama New Wing, Government Buildings SUVA. Re: Travel Bans on Judiciary I forward to you a copy of my Press Statement on the above subject delivered on 1 November 2009. I also forward the correspondence and documents in the matter for your perusal if required. The Australian authorities have now said they were going to give the transit visas to the Sri Lankan judges. In the well worn phrases of political life, this can only be described as “damage control”. The day of departure would have passed as it did for Justice Wati’s child’s operation. Why too were the applications not treated as routine and granted in the usual way? Unbeknowns to the visa officer, one of the judges taped the conversation in which the officer clearly said the visa was declined. A copy of the tape is now with the media. The official denial adds further shame to the Australians’ conduct in the matter. It is clear both the Australians and New Zealanders realise only too well that theirs is a shabby policy. More to the point these policies are a quite indefensible interference with our judiciary. The policy as espoused in the Acting High Commissioner’s letter suggests they will deal with it on a case by case basis. Therein lies their plea of guilty to the charge of interference, for they will choose which judge to let in and which to refuse. I have already said the judiciary cannot expect help from any quarter, that is the nature of our independent role. However from the political point of view, can the executive allow such interference to continue? A.H.C.T Gates Chief Justice Encl.

———————————————————————-

Corruption exposed! Aiyaz has given his brother a multi-million business leg-up

The sudden and until now unreported promulgation of the Regulation of National Spectrum Decree marks the final stages of Fiji’s transition from a democratic tropical paradise into a corrupt totalitarian fascist state.

And, as we will explain here, it will be the sort of fascist state that will allow the Sayed-Khaiyum brothers, Aiyaz and Riyaz, to consolidate their power over our lives and amass huge wealth.

Not only does the Decree gives Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum absolute power over all Fiji broadcast frequencies, it also gives his younger brother a multi-million dollar business advantage.

That’s not called happy coincidence, it’s called corruption.

Read the fine print of the Decree and you see that it just happens to leave Riyaz, who is head of FBCL, sitting in the box seat.

FCBL has taken out a $17 million loan from Fiji Development Bank to set up a new television station, but the provisions of the Decree are carefully crafted to now allow Aiyaz to re-allocate Fiji Television’s frequencies to his brother’s new television station.

As freedom blogger Coup Four A Half reports: “the decision by Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum to make all broadcast licences and frequencies temporary with immediate effect means that FBCL will be the biggest beneficiary of this Decree.

“Frequencies used by Fiji Television can now be re-allocated entirely or shared by FBCL’s new television service without having to invest millions to set up transmitters or carry out a marketing campaign because people already have antennas and have their television sets tuned for the current frequency used by Fiji TV’s free channel”.

In addition to being the instrument by which the Sayed-Khaiyum brothers can line their pockets, the Decree, like its draconian cousin, the PER, is clearly designed to control media content.

The Decree and the PER together mean that the regime now has complete and absolute control over all media across our nation.

And under the provisions of the Decree, broadcasters who object to being disadvantaged in any way have no recourse to justice.

That’s not called “reform”, it’s called fascist dictatorship.

It’s proves that Frank Bainimarama and his rat-bag cronies have no intention of ever allowing free and fair elections in Fiji that could cause them to give up their hold on power.

And it proves that Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum is by far the most evil and greedy member of the dictator’s immediate coterie of self-serving acolytes.

This is the same man whose racist proclivities were so clearly announced when he wrote in his rambling university thesis that there should be a “sunset clause” on traditional Fijian culture.

Now we know why he saw a huge opportunity in supporting the idiot Bainimarama’s overthrow of our legally elected government.

Aiyaz saw for himself the opportunity to get the power to invoke the “Sunset Clause” and corruptly exercise that power for his own and his family’s benefit.

His latest Decree will give his brother’s company a windfall of millions of dollars by enabling it to hijack a huge part of the television broadcasting spectrum that other companies have built up through honest and diligent work.

It’s no wonder that the majority of senior officers on the Military Council who still have Fiji’s best interests at heart cannot stomach the likes of the corrupt Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum and are demanding his ouster.

But you can be sure that the dictator will stand by his boy wonder.

Because Aiyaz has delivered what amounts to totalitarian control of everything we hear and see in the media in addition to what we are allowed to read.

Thanks to Aiyaz, our military dictatorship is now freed of the last vestiges of accountability.

In addition to corruptly playing Santa Claus to his little brother, Aiyaz has given our power-mad, grubby little dictator the best Christmas present he could have hoped for.

Fiji Democracy Now

http://rawfijinews.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/anthony-gates-letter-to-frank-bainimarama-resulting-in-anz-envoy-expulsion/

Older Posts »